Wednesday 25 March 2015

Applying Praise.

In my search for further understanding of the developing mind, I came across this article via twitter.  This is a book that I am very interested in reading.  Maybe you will too.

Happy Learning!

Presence, Not Praise: How To Cultivate a Healthy Relationship with Achievement

by 
Why instilling admiration for hard work rather than raw talent is the key to fostering a well-adjusted mind.
Despite ample evidence and countless testaments to the opposite, there persists a toxic cultural mythology that creative and intellectual excellence comes from a passive gift bestowed upon the fortunate few by the gods of genius, rather than being the product of the active application and consistent cultivation of skill. So what might the root of that stubborn fallacy be? Childhood and upbringing, it turns out, might have a lot to do.
In The Examined Life: How We Lose and Find Ourselves (public library), psychoanalyst and University College London professor Stephen Grosz builds on more than 50,000 hours of conversation from his quarter-century experience as a practicing psychoanalyst to explore the machinery of our inner life, with insights that are invariably profound and often provocative — for instance, a section titled “How praise can cause a loss of confidence,” in which Grosz writes:
Nowadays, we lavish praise on our children. Praise, self-confidence and academic performance, it is commonly believed, rise and fall together. But current research suggests otherwise — over the past decade, a number of studies on self-esteem have come to the conclusion that praising a child as ‘clever’ may not help her at school. In fact, it might cause her to under-perform. Often a child will react to praise by quitting — why make a new drawing if you have already made ‘the best’? Or a child may simply repeat the same work — why draw something new, or in a new way, if the old way always gets applause?
Grosz cites psychologists Carol Dweck and Claudia Mueller’s famous 1998 study, which divided 128 children ages 10 and 11 into two groups. All were asked to solve mathematical problems, but one group were praised for their intellect (“You did really well, you’re so clever.”) while the other for their effort (“You did really well, you must have tried really hard.”) The kids were then given more complex problems, which those previously praised for their hard work approached with dramatically greater resilience and willingness to try different approaches whenever they reached a dead end. By contrast, those who had been praised for their cleverness were much more anxious about failure, stuck with tasks they had already mastered, and dwindled in tenacity in the face of new problems. Grosz summarizes the now-legendary findings:
Ultimately, the thrill created by being told ‘You’re so clever’ gave way to an increase in anxiety and a drop in self-esteem, motivation and performance. When asked by the researchers to write to children in another school, recounting their experience, some of the ‘clever’ children lied, inflating their scores. In short, all it took to knock these youngsters’ confidence, to make them so unhappy that they lied, was one sentence of praise.
He goes on to admonish against today’s culture of excessive parental praise, which he argues does more for lifting the self-esteem of the parents than for cultivating a healthy one in their children:
Admiring our children may temporarily lift our self-esteem by signaling to those around us what fantastic parents we are and what terrific kids we have — but it isn’t doing much for a child’s sense of self. In trying so hard to be different from our parents, we’re actually doing much the same thing — doling out empty praise the way an earlier generation doled out thoughtless criticism. If we do it to avoid thinking about our child and her world, and about what our child feels, then praise, just like criticism, is ultimately expressing our indifference.
To explore what the healthier substitute for praise might be, he recounts observing an eighty-year-old remedial reading teacher named Charlotte Stiglitz, the mother of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz, who told Grosz of her teaching methodology:
I don’t praise a small child for doing what they ought to be able to do,’ she told me. ‘I praise them when they do something really difficult — like sharing a toy or showing patience. I also think it is important to say “thank you”. When I’m slow in getting a snack for a child, or slow to help them and they have been patient, I thank them. But I wouldn’t praise a child who is playing or reading.
Rather than utilizing the familiar mechanisms of reward and punishment, Grosz observed, Charlotte’s method relied on keen attentiveness to “what a child did and how that child did it.” He recounts:
I once watched Charlotte with a four-year-old boy, who was drawing. When he stopped and looked up at her — perhaps expecting praise — she smiled and said, ‘There is a lot of blue in your picture.’ He replied, ‘It’s the pond near my grandmother’s house — there is a bridge.’ He picked up a brown crayon, and said, ‘I’ll show you.’ Unhurried, she talked to the child, but more importantly she observed, she listened. She was present.
Presence, he argues, helps build the child’s confidence by way of indicating he is worthy of the observer’s thoughts and attention — its absence, on the other hand, divorces in the child the journey from the destination by instilling a sense that the activity itself is worthless unless it’s a means to obtaining praise. Grosz reminds us how this plays out for all of us, and why it matters throughout life:
Being present, whether with children, with friends, or even with oneself, is always hard work. But isn’t this attentiveness — the feeling that someone is trying to think about us — something we want more than praise?
The Examined Life goes on to explore such enduring facets of the meaning of existence as our inextinguishable urge to change ourselves, the gift of ignorance, and the challenges of intimacy, deconstructing the wall in philosopher Simone Weil’s famous prison parable to reveal the many dimensions in which our desire “to understand and be understood” manifests.
Public domain images via Flickr Commons

Saturday 14 March 2015

An overview on all the different Montessori training and organisations.

I came across a great resource on the web called www.montessorianswers.com.  It provided interesting reading and one area that stuck out were the different affiliations within Montessori.  Below is an extract from that site.

Training and Certifications

There is a big difference between being "trained" and "certified".  There also is a big difference between certifications. 

Certification is a process where you take classes in Montessori philosophy, classroom organization and management, curriculum, and manipulatives.  You will be required to write papers, make a manual which is  a compilation of the Montessori Lesson plans, and pass tests. 
Training can be deceptive. In theory, it is the course that you take to become a certified Montessori teacher. Sadly, in reality, anything the director of a school calls "training" is training. 

If you have a good director and your school is a "real" Montessori school your training will be a course that leads to certification, but if you are at a school that is not a "true" Montessori school your "training" might just be a meeting where you learn the ins and outs of a school, or where you read a little bit about Montessori philosophy.

Just because you are "trained" doesn't mean that you are "certified". If you are serious about becoming a Montessori Teacher you NEED to be Certified by a credible Montessori training Centre.

Montessori Certifications and Training Centers

There are two main interpretations of the Montessori Philosophy. AMI and AMS. Both interpretations are well thought out and valid, although they differ strongly on certain points. When looking into a school you need to know which interpretation meshes more closely with your philosophical educational beliefs.

AMI (Association Montessori Internationale) - was established by Maria Montessori and her son, Mario in 1929 and has international headquarters in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. In AMI schools, Montessori philosophy and curriculum are implemented in a way that is consistent with the original approach of Maria Montessori.

The Montessori materials are used precisely in the manner used by Dr. Montessori without deviation or extensions; preserving what proponents of this interpretation believe is the purity of the method.

AMS (American Montessori Society) - In the late 1960 Nancy McCormick Rambusch, an AMI Montessori trained teacher founded the American Montessori Society (AMS). She firmly believed that aspects of the Montessori method had to be modified to accommodate the culture in America.

In AMS schools, teachers continue the methods developed by Dr. Montessori while bringing in outside resources, materials, and ideas to extend or supplement the Montessori curriculum. Examples include the use of technology and current events.

If you are someone who believes children should have computer skills (for example being taught how to make reports with Word and presentations with Power Point once they are ready for it) and knowledge about appropriate current events, then you need to look for a training center that is accredited by AMS.

On the other hand, if you want to insure that your student's Montessori experience is authentic without any outside influences, or "watering down" you should look for training centres that AMI.

IMC stands for -The International Montessori Council.The International Montessori Council (IMC) is a global community of Montessori schools, teacher education programs, school administrators, educators, trustees, parent leaders, and friends of the Montessori movement. Members of the International Montessori Council are dedicated to enriching the lives of children and adults through Montessori education by promoting Dr. Maria Montessori'’s insights into the human potential to the general public.

As of yet there is no IMC training program, but The Center for Guided Montessori Studies is working towards being the first  IMC training program. There is an IMC school accreditation.

MACTE stands for the Montessori Accreditation Council for Teacher Education. It is an internationally recognized, standards setting and accrediting body for Montessori Teacher Eduction. 

MACTE accredited teacher training programs in the US 
MACTE accredited teacher training programs outside the US

(views of website owner)
There are other training centres like Modern Montessori, USAMONTESSORI, and CERDS, usually they are on-line programs, and most real Montessori schools will not, (for good reason), accept their training graduates. I won't say that they don't have their heart in the right place, but Montessori is a hands on multi-modality integrated method of education, it is hard to truly understand and learn well enough to run your own classroom simply by reading about it and looking at videos on the web. The paradigm shift from traditional education is so great that most, if not all people, need time to really observe and experience everything in action. You need time to use the materials yourself, see them in action, and how they are handled, not just in theory, but in reality - by little hands. As well as seeing how a classroom is set up and works. This cannot be done with a short little overview and a few videos. Believe me, I've seen over and over how someone with a little bit of knowledge in Montessori will have so many problems running a successful classroom, not out of inability, but because they don't understand how all the pieces fit together, that the whole program goes under. Please don't let this happen you.

For example, look at USAmontessori's website they even state, “While a traditional program may be the most thorough way to acquire Montessori training" "MOST THOROUGH" way? So their way isn't thorough? How can their graduates be truly effective teachers, especially in something like Montessori education which has many layers and sides if they don't have the complete idea?

Please, share your own thoughts on this?

Happy Learning!


What parents would ask a Tutor when hiring them.

I read an article on the Sunday Times from a couple of years ago on the requirements of a tutor.  It makes sense for the parent so I'll share with you.  These are the 5 areas that would need to be addressed when choosing a tutor for your child.

1 What does your child need? 
Is your child in need of extra help to get a better grade in a particular subject, or do they have more general requirements such as learning how to write an essay well? Check the views of your child’s teachers about the strengths and weaknesses they've observed and how extra teaching can be put to best use.
2 Is the tutor qualified?
Do they have a degree in the subject they are teaching? Do they have teaching experience and knowledge of the curriculum your child is studying at school? Ask for up-to-date client references including phone numbers.
3 Will your child like this tutor?
There’s more to good tutoring than subject knowledge and qualifications. The best tutors build a rapport with a child, winning their confidence. Consider sitting in on the first lesson to check that you’re happy with the tutor’s approach and skills.
4 Will your child be safe with this tutor?
Tutors should be able to produce an up-to-date Criminal Records Bureau certificate. If you’re relying on word of mouth recommendation, don’t assume that the tutor’s previous clients have made the same checks you would.
5 How will you know if the tuition is working?
Be clear about the goals you are expecting your child to meet. Ask for a learning plan. And agree at the outset how long the tuition will need to continue.
I hope this helps parents reading this as well as tutors who offer their services understand the parent's concern.
Happy Learning!

Thursday 12 March 2015

Natural Consequences

I thought I would talk about the times when we all come across a child who doesn't want to do something or all out refuses. Being a parent I have come across this situation a good few times already and being a teacher i have come across it at least every day!

My favourite term is what i will be talking about which is 'natural consequences'. This simply means what will naturally happen if things keep going the way they are.

To give an example there was a time when I was teaching some time ago,  an incident happened where Child A disrupted Child B's work. Child B got upset and I called Child A back over (since by now they had decided to run from the scene of the crime!) and explained that Child B was upset and "what do you think we should say to make them feel better?"

Child A decided it was a time to lose their voice and all of a sudden become interested in the floor. It was after a while I then said "OK since you want to have some time to think i will wait until you are ready to speak". It was during this time that all the other children were getting into a group and singing songs and playing games which Child A noticed.

I let Child B put away their work and join the group explaining to them that "it's OK, Child A will come over and speak to you when they are ready". So I waited there for a while with Child A who of course wanted to join the group but could see I wasn't about to let them join it without clearing up this situation. 

After reminding them of this fact a few minutes later I could see on their face that they had made the decision, they walked up to Child B and said "sorry" and then turned to look at me. I simply smiled and said "you can join the group now".

This above example is just one of many i have of how simply these situations can be resolved without the need for saying "Now what do you say!?!" or making them feel 'naughty' by placing them on a 'naughty chair' or any other sort of punishment I have seen in my many years of teaching. Some parents i see have even chosen to ignore this type of behaviour that their children do just because "its too much hard work to deal with" or "there is no time". 

Now I know how hard it is for a mum sometimes especially when you're in a rush but I personally feel that the sooner children learn how to be socially and treat their friends with respect, the more they will grow as a caring individual which we need more of in today's world.

I think its sometimes easy to forget that these children will grow up to be adults and how letting these behaviours slip like this can result in adults who don't take responsibility for their own actions e.g. a 'hit and run' car accident (OK so maybe I'm being over the top). 

One way we can make sure this will not happen is to let our children know its OK to make mistakes as long as they take responsibility for them and like I said there are natural consequences for every action.

I could go on forever but I just hope that this entry will give parents & teachers some food for thought about how they can adapt this situation to others they come across.

Please share your thoughts and feedback and have a good weekend.

Happy Learning!